|   From: Thomas Hockey et al. (eds.). The Biographical Encyclopedia of Astronomers, Springer Reference. New York: Springer, 2007, p. 567  | 
    
|  
           Courtesy of   
         | 
    
Ibn Sahl: Abū Saʿd al‐ʿAlāʾ ibn Sahl 
Len Berggren
Flourished  late 10th century
Ibn 
    Sahl was a geometer who worked in the late 10th century. Although he is not 
    mentioned in the known biobibliographical sources from the medieval period, 
    Ibn Sahl is mentioned by Ibn al‐Haytham, 
    whose working life spanned the late 10th and early 11th centuries. On the 
    other hand, he commented on one of Abū Sahl 
    al‐Kūhī's 
    treatises, and Kūhī probably died before the end of the 10th century. 
    
His 
    two works most relevant to the history of astronomy are his Proof that 
    the Vault of the Heavens Is Not Completely Transparent and his commentary 
    on Abū Sahl al‐Kūhī's treatise on the astrolabe. In the 
    former he gives, inspired by his study of the fifth book of Ptolemy's 
    Optics, a proof that whatever substance one is given, such as that 
    composing the heavenly spheres of Aristotelian cosmology, it is always possible 
    to find a substance that refracts light less. Ibn Sahl agrees with Aristotle, 
    however, that the heavenly spheres are indeed more transparent than any sublunar 
    substance such as crystal. It is this work that Ibn al‐Haytham cites 
    in his short treatise Discourse on Light. 
Very 
    much connected with this treatise is another of Ibn Sahl's works, this one 
    on burning mirrors. In it he addresses the question of how to design not just 
    mirrors but lenses that will focus incoming light rays at a given distance. 
    He distinguishes between the cases in which the incoming rays originate from 
    a source such as the Sun, which may be considered to be at an infinite distance, 
    or from a source at a finite distance. Ibn Sahl considers both the theoretical 
    and the practical aspects of this problem, which in the case of lenses demands 
    consideration of refraction. And he states a geometrical relation between 
    incident and refracted rays that, rewritten in modern trigonometric notation, 
    is equivalent to the Law of Refraction, although it does not involve the notion 
    of the refractive index of a medium. 
In his 
    commentary on Kūhī's astrolabe treatise, Ibn Sahl discusses the 
    different possibilities for an astrolabe formed by projecting the sphere on 
    to two surfaces. He argues that since one surface must rotate smoothly over 
    the other, and remain completely in contact with it during the rotation, such 
    surfaces must arise as surfaces of revolution of some curve around the axis 
    of the sphere. In addition, the curve, which may of course be a straight line, 
    must lie in a plane containing the axis. Among the more unusual examples he 
    mentions for surfaces of astrolabes are those of conics of revolution, such 
    as paraboloids.
Rashed, Roshdi (1993). Géométrie et dioptrique au Xe siècle: Ibn Sahl, 
    al‐Qūhī et Ibn al‐Haytham. Paris: 
    Les Belles Lettres. 
Sabra, 
    A. I. (1989). The Optics of Ibn al‐Haytham: 
    Books I–III On Direct Vision. 2 Vols. London: Warburg Institute, esp. 
    vol. 2, lii–liii and lx. 
Sezgin, 
    Fuat Geschichte des arabischen 
    Schrifttums. Vol. 5, Mathematik (1974): 341–342. Vol. 6, Astronomie (1978): 232–233. Leiden: 
    E. J. Brill.