Born Nīshāpūr,
(Iran)
Died (Iran), 1329/1330
Niẓām
al‐Dīn al‐Aʿraj al‐Nīsābūrī
composed several widely studied astronomy texts in the 14th century, which
indicate the integration of astronomy within a tradition of religious scholarship
in Islamic civilization. He was born into a Shīʿa family with
roots in Qum.
The sources say little about Nīsābūrī's early life
and education. By mid‐1303, Nīsābūrī had begun
to write Sharḥ Taḥrīr al‐Majisṭī
(Commentary on the recension of the Almagest), a commentary on Naṣīr al‐Dīn al‐Ṭūsī's Taḥrīr al‐Majisṭī
(Recension of the Almagest) of Ptolemy.
As was true for many commentaries in Islamic science, Nīsābūrī
did not simply explain the meanings of the original text but included the
results of his own work as well. In the Sharḥ, Nīsābūrī
devoted much space to observations of the obliquity of the ecliptic and
to ʿUrḍī's work on instrument
construction. Nīsābūrī also investigated whether Venus
and Mercury had been observed to transit the Sun, an observation that would
determine the position of the Sun with respect to Mercury and Venus. In
1304, Nīsābūrī arrived in Azerbaijan; by 1306 he was
in Tabrīz, the largest city in Azerbaijan, where he completed the Sharḥ. In Tabrīz, Nīsābūrī
also began to study with the astronomer Quṭb al‐Dīn al‐Shīrāzī.
Nīsābūrī
completed his second major text, Kashf‐i ḥaqāʾiq‐i Zīj‐i
Īlkhānī (Uncovering of the truths of the
Īlkhānid astronomical handbook), in 1308/1309. The Kashf,
a commentary on Ṭūsī's astronomical handbook
entitled Zīj‐i Īlkhānī, refers to the Sharḥ. Nīsābūrī wrote the Kashf
right after the Sharḥ
inasmuch as the Kashf focused on topics that were closely connected
to the Sharḥ, such as the observation
and prediction of planetary positions.
The Tawḍīḥ al‐Tadhkira (Elucidation
of the Tadhkira), a commentary on Ṭūsī's
al‐Tadhkira fī ʿilm al‐hayʾa (Memento on astronomy), was Nīsābūrī's
third and final text on astronomy. A cross‐reference to a Tadhkira
commentary in the Sharḥ shows that Nīsābūrī
had begun to compose the Tawḍīḥ before he finished the
Sharḥ.
In
the Tawḍīḥ, Nīsābūrī
investigated theoretical topics, such as non‐Ptolemaic models for
planetary motions, and topics that combined theory and observations, such
as physical hypotheses that accounted for the observed variations in the
obliquity of the ecliptic. Although the Sharḥ and the Tawḍīḥ evinced a mastery of the
technical innovations of Islamic astronomy, Nīsābūrī
did not make significant advances with the most difficult questions. Shīrāzī,
however, did, and the weight of Shīrāzī's reputation may
explain the coincidence of the date of the appearance of the Tawḍīḥ with the date of Shīrāzī's
death in 1311.
Īlkhānid
ministers patronized Nīsābūrī's scientific work. The
Īlkhānids were the descendents of Hülegü Khān (died: 1265),
who had patronized the construction of the famous observatory at Marāgha,
Azerbaijan, where both Ṭūsī and Shīrāzī
worked. Nīsābūrī dedicated the Sharḥ
to Khwāja Saʿd al‐Dīn
Muḥammad ibn ʿAlī
al‐Sāwajī. Sāwajī was chief minister (along with
Rashīd al‐Dīn) under Īlkhānid Sultan Ghāzān
(reigned: 1295–1304) and continued in that post until 1312 when Rashīd
al‐Dīn had him executed. Shīrāzī's acquaintance
with Sāwajī would have provided a way for Nīsābūrī
to gain Sāwajī's patronage. There is a 1309 copy of the Kashf
dedicated to al‐Sāwajī. Nīsābūrī dedicated
the Tawḍīḥ to a certain ʿAli
ibn Maḥmūd al‐Yazdī.
Because
the Sharḥ
and the Tawḍīḥ were clearly written and
intended for nonexpert astronomers, they became important components of
a tradition of religious scholarship that included astronomy. Many manuscripts
of the Sharḥ and Tawḍīḥ have ownership statements
from the libraries of madrasas (colleges of religious studies). Two
reports attest to how the Tawḍīḥ was the most important
text at Ulugh Beg's madrasa in Samarqand for the study
of the Tadhkira. Later works on Islamic astronomy, also with madrasa
library ownership statements, refer to Nīsābūrī as al‐shāriḥ (the commentator).
Nīsābūrī's
best‐known text, his Quran commentary entitled Gharāʾib
al‐Qurʾān wa‐raghāʾib al‐furqān
(The curiosities of the Quran and the desiderata of the demonstration),
demonstrates the importance of science for religious scholars. Nīsābūrī
in general relied heavily on Fakhr al‐Dīn al‐Rāzī's
(died: 1209) al‐Tafsīr al‐kabīr (The great
commentary), but frequently disagreed with Rāzī about the use
of science and philosophy (falsafa) to portray nature. The Gharāʾib
reflected Nīsābūrī's scientific education and privileged
the views of the natural philosophers ( falāsifa), while
Rāzī had favored the positions of the theologians (mutakallimūn).
Through subtle rewordings and emendations of scientific detail, Nīsābūrī
rebutted Rāzī's critique of science and falsafa in his
portrayal of nature. Nīsābūrī completed Gharāʾib
in 1329/1330, a date which the bio‐bibliographers consider to be the
date of his death.
——— (2005). “The Role of Portrayals of Nature in Medieval Qurʾān
Commentaries.” Arabica 52: 182–203.
Rosenfeld, B. A. and Ekmeleddin Ihsanoğlu (2003). Mathematicians,
Astronomers, and Other Scholars of Islamic Civilization and Their Works (7th–19th
c.). Istanbul: IRCICA, pp. 238–239.