From: Thomas Hockey et al. (eds.). The Biographical Encyclopedia of Astronomers, Springer Reference. New York: Springer, 2007, pp. 630-631

Courtesy of

Khujandī: Abū Mamūd āmid ibn al‐Khir al‐Khujandī

Glen Van Brummelen

BornKhujand, (Tajikstan), circa 945


Khujandī was an astronomer of some repute who constructed a variety of instruments and contributed to the mathematics supporting astronomical work. He is best known for the first very large mural quadrant that was intended to make solar observations of unprecedented accuracy. Only a few details are known of his life; he was likely one of the khans of Khujanda in Transoxania and was supported by the Būyid ruler Fakhr al‐Dawla.

Khujandī's towering achievement, the giant mural sextant near Rayy, was perhaps the most ambitious instrument of its time. Named al‐suds al‐Fakhrī (after its sponsor Fakhr al‐Dawla), it consisted of 60° of a meridian arc about 43 m in diameter, built at and below ground level. A small aperture in the roof of the building that housed the instrument allowed a cone of the Sun's rays to shine through. A circle with crosshatch lines was placed on the rays that fell onto the scale in order to determine their center. The scale was marked to 10', making it the first instrument capable of measuring with a precision better than minutes.

In 994 Khujandī used the suds al‐Fakhrī to measure meridian transits near solstices; from this he obtained the value ε = 23;32,19° for the obliquity of the ecliptic, and a value of 35;34,38.45° for the latitude of Rayy (accurate to within one'). On the basis of earlier determinations of ε, Khujandī decided that ε is a variable quantity, a conclusion with which Bīrūnī disagreed. In his Tadīd al‐amākin, Bīrūnī discusses Khujandī's work in detail. He argues that the measurements failed to produce the expected accuracy because the building settled between the summer and winter solstices, causing the height of the aperture in the roof to drop. After the failure of the suds al‐Fakhrī, the observational program probably continued with armillary spheres and other instruments, and Khujandī eventually produced the Zīj al‐Fakhrī (an astronomical handbook) on the basis of his results. (A partially extant Persian zīj written 200 years later may also derive from Khujandī's observations.) Although the large instrument was an immediate failure, it was a model for similar instruments at the observatories in Marāgha and Samarqand in the 13th and 15th centuries, respectively. These avoided the problem of settling by using different construction materials.

Astronomical instruments are a recurring interest in Khujandī's other works. A treatise entitled The Comprehensive Instrument describes an invention called a shāmila designed to replace the astrolabe or a quadrant. It was not universal in the sense that it was restricted for use in a particular range of terrestrial latitudes.

Two geometric methods of drawing azimuth circles on an astrolabe are credited to Khujandī by other medieval authors. He constructed an astrolabe in 984/985, which is one of the earliest still extant. It is considered to be one of the most important surviving astronomical instruments.

Khujandī composed several mathematical works, among them a text on geometry and a flawed proof of Fermat's last theorem for n = 3. He is also one of several competing claimants to the rule of four quantities, a theorem in spherical trigonometry that was simpler than Menelaus' theorem and, for many Muslim astronomers, replaced it as the basic tool of spherical astronomy.

Selected References

Al‐Bīrūnī, Abū Rayān (1985). Kitāb Maqālīd ʿilm al‐hayʾa: La trigonométrie sphérique chez les arabes de l'est à la fin du Xesiècle, edited and translated by Marie‐Thérèse Debarnot. Damascus: Institut français de Damas.

Ali, Jamil (trans.) (1967). The Determination of the Coordinates of Cities: Al‐Bīrūnī's Taḥdīd al‐Amākin. Beirut: American University of Beirut.

Berggren, J. L. (1991). “Medieval Islamic Methods for Drawing Azimuth Circles on the Astrolabe.” Centaurus 34: 309–344.

Cheikho, Louis (1908). “Risālat al‐Khujandī fī al‐mayl wa ʿard al‐balad.” Al‐Machriq 11: 60–69.

Frank, Josef (1921). “Über zwei astronomische arabische Instrumente.” Zeitschrift für Instrumentenkunde 41: 193–200.

Kennedy, E. S. (1973). A Commentary Upon Bīrūnī's Kitāb Taḥdīd al‐Amākin. Beirut: American University of Beirut.

Samsó, Julio (1969). Estudios sobre Abū Nar Manūr b. ʿAlī b. ʿIrāq. Barcelona: Asociación para la Historia de la Ciencia Española.

——— (1986). “Al‐Khudjandī.” In Encyclopaedia of Islam. 2nd ed. Vol. 5, pp. 46–47. Leiden: E. J. Brill.

Sayılı, Aydin (1960). The Observatory in Islam. Ankara: Turkish Historical Society.

Schirmer, Oskar (1926/1927). “Studien zur Astronomie der Araber.” Sitzungsberichte der Physikalisch‐Medizinische Sozietät in Erlangen 58–59: 33–88.

Tekeli, Sevim (1973). “Al‐Khujandī.” In Dictionary of Scientific Biography, edited by Charles Coulston Gillispie. Vol. 7, pp. 352–354. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.

Wiedemann, E. (1919). “Über den Sextant des al‐Chogendi.” Archiv für die Geschichte der Naturwissenschaften und der Technik 2: 148–151.