|   From: Thomas Hockey et al. (eds.). The Biographical Encyclopedia of Astronomers, Springer Reference. New York: Springer, 2007, pp. 604-605  | 
    
|  
           Courtesy of   
         | 
    
Jūzjānī: Abū ʿUbayd ʿAbd al‐Wāḥid ibn 
    Muḥammad 
    al‐Jūzjānī 
Alnoor Dhanani
Flourished  (Iran), 11th 
    century
Jūzjānī 
    was one of the earliest Islamic scientists to provide an alternative to Ptolemy's 
    equant model. Very little is known about his life. He probably was already 
    a jurist ( faqīh) in Jurjān when he met Ibn 
    Sīnā in 1012. He became one of his students and tells us 
    that he studied Ptolemy's Almagest and logic with Ibn Sīnā. 
    He aided Ibn Sīnā with the compilation of the Cure (al‐Shifāʾ) 
    and added the sections on geometry, arithmetic, astronomy, and music from 
    Ibn Sīnā's earlier works to the Salvation (al‐Najāt) 
    as well as the Philosophy for ʿAlā 
    al‐dawla (Dānishnāme‐I ʿAlāʾī ). Jūzjānī commented 
    on the difficult passages of Ibn Sīnā's Canon of Medicine 
    (al‐Qānūn fī al‐ṭibb) and translated the “Book 
    on Animals” of the Cure from Arabic into Persian. He completed Ibn 
    Sīnā's Autobiography after his death. Jūzjānī 
    is also the author of The Manner of Arrangement of the Spheres (Kitāb 
    Kayfiyyat tarkīb al‐aflāk), which has not survived, as 
    well as a surviving Summary (Mulakhkhaṣ) of this work. Finally, 
    he is the author of Summary of the Arrangement of the Spheres (Khilāṣ 
    tarkīb al‐aflāk), which is a commentary on Farghānī's 
    influential Elements of Astronomy and Celestial Motions (Jawāmiʿ 
    ʿilm al‐nujūm wa‐ʾl‐ḥarakāt al‐samāwiyya). 
In his 
    Summary of The Manner of Arrangement of the Spheres, Jūzjānī 
    tells us of his abiding interest in astronomy and his difficulty comprehending 
    the equant and the components of motion in latitude (inclination, twisting, 
    and slant of the epicycle). He turned to Ibn Sīnā for guidance and 
    was told: “I came to understand the problem after great effort and much toil 
    and I will not teach it to anybody. Apply yourself to it and it may be revealed 
    to you as it was revealed to me.” Jūzjānī was skeptical of 
    Ibn Sīnā's claim for he states: “I suspect I was the first to achieve 
    an understanding of these problems.” Jūzjānī's issue with the 
    equant is that “we know that the motions of celestial bodies cannot be nonuniform, 
    so that they are at times faster and at times slower. This has been demonstrated 
    in physics (al‐ʿilm 
    al‐ṭabīʿī).” Jūzjānī proposes 
    to “solve” the equant problem with a model in which all spheres (the deferent, 
    the epicycle, and a secondary epicycle) move at uniform speeds around their 
    centers. However, the model is unworkable. 
The significance of Jūzjānī's critique of the equant 
    does not lie in his unworkable solution but rather in the fact that his contribution 
    is independent of the critique of the equant in the work of his elder contemporary 
    Ibn al‐Haytham entitled 
    Doubts against Ptolemy (Shukūk ʿalā 
    Baṭlamyūs). These represent the 
    earliest known critiques of Ptolemy's equant hypothesis, which ultimately 
    led to alternative models formulated by Naṣīr 
    al‐Dīn al‐Ṭūsī and others (sometimes 
    referred to as the “Marāgha School”) regarding planetary motion that 
    did not resort to the equant. While Ibn al‐Haytham's critique seems 
    to have been more influential, the Marāgha astronomers were aware of 
    Jūzjānī's contribution. In his polemical You Did It, So 
    Don't Blame Me! (Faʿalta fa‐lā talum), Quṭb al‐Dīn al‐Shīrāzī 
    preserves an extensive reference to Jūzjānī's effort.
Al‐Bayhaqī, 
    Ẓāhir 
    al‐Dīn (1996). Tārīkh ḥukamāʾ al‐islām. Cairo: Maktabat 
    al‐thaqāfa al‐dīniyya. 
Gohlman, William E. (1974). The Life of Ibn Sīnā: 
    A Critical Edition and Annotated Translation. Albany: State University 
    of New York Press. 
Gutas, Dimitri (1988). Avicenna and the Aristotelian Tradition. 
    Leiden: E. J. Brill. 
Ragep, F. J. (1993). 
    Naṣīr al‐Dīn 
    al‐Ṭūsī's Memoir 
    on Astronomy (al‐Tadhkira fī  ʿilm al‐hayʾa). 
    2 Vols. New York: Springer‐Verlag. 
Saliba, George (1994). “Ibn Sīnā and Abū  ʿUbayd 
    al‐Jūzjānī: The Problem of the Ptolemaic Equant.” In 
    A History of Arabic Astronomy: Planetary Theories during the Golden Age 
    of Islam. New York: New York University Press, pp. 85–112. (Originally 
    published in Journal for the History of Arabic Science 4 [1980]: 376–403.) 
    
——— (1994). “Arabic 
    Astronomy and Copernicus.” In A History of Arabic Astronomy: Planetary 
    Theories during the Golden Age of Islam. New York: New York University 
    Press, pp. 291–305. (Originally published in Zeitschrift für Geschichte 
    der Arabisch‐Islamischen Wissenschaften 1 [1984]: 73–87.) 
Sezgin, 
    Fuat (1978). Geschichte des arabischen Schrifttums. Vol. 6, Astronomie, pp. 280–281. Leiden: E. J. Brill.